ASUS ZenWiFi AX6600 Tri-Band Mesh System
- 15%
Set Lowest Price Alert
ร
Notify me, when price drops
Set Alert for Product: Restored ASUS ZenWiFi AX6600 Tri-Band Mesh WiFi 6 System (XT8 1PK) (Black)- (Refurbished) - $169.99
Last Amazon price update was: January 7, 2025 15:14
ร
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon.com (Amazon.in, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.de, etc) at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
ASUS ZenWiFi AX6600 Tri-Band Mesh System
Original price was: $199.99.$169.99Current price is: $169.99.
ASUS ZenWiFi AX6600 Tri-Band Mesh System Price comparison
ASUS ZenWiFi AX6600 Tri-Band Mesh System Price History
Price History for Restored ASUS ZenWiFi AX6600 Tri-Band Mesh WiFi 6 System (XT8 1PK) (Black)- (Refurbished)
Statistics
Current Price | $169.99 | January 7, 2025 |
Highest Price | $199.99 | August 10, 2024 |
Lowest Price | $169.99 | November 29, 2024 |
Since August 10, 2024
Last price changes
$169.99 | November 29, 2024 |
$199.99 | August 10, 2024 |
ASUS ZenWiFi AX6600 Tri-Band Mesh System Description
- Maximum Range : 5500 Sq Ft.LED Indicator : Power x 1. Power Supply : AC Input : 110V~240V(50~60Hz), DC Output : 19 V with max. 1.75 A current, DC Output : 12 V with max. 3 A current.
- Banish WiFi Dead ZoneโTri-band mesh WiFi system with unique antenna placement delivers strong WiFi to every corner of your home providing total wireless speed of 6600Mbps
- Next-Gen Wi-Fi 6 Technologyโ With OFDMA and MU-MIMO ZenWiFi AX enables more efficient stable and faster transmission even when multiple devices are transmitting data at the same time
- Hassle Free Control โ 3 steps setup and easy management with ASUS Router App
- Always Up-to-date Protectionโ The lifetime free network security powered by Trend Micro makes sure your privacy on connected devices is protected
ASUS ZenWiFi AX6600 Tri-Band Mesh System Specification
Specification: ASUS ZenWiFi AX6600 Tri-Band Mesh System
|
ASUS ZenWiFi AX6600 Tri-Band Mesh System Reviews (7)
7 reviews for ASUS ZenWiFi AX6600 Tri-Band Mesh System
Show all
Most Helpful
Highest Rating
Lowest Rating
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Texas TV –
Ya habia probado varios aparatos para poder sostener e “incrementar” la velocidad de mi WIFI en toda la casa, estos aparatos en verdad impresionan, en cualquier punto de mi casa de 2 pisos, la seรฑal llega y alcanza casi lo mismo que cuando estas a lado del modem, mi caso tengo 500 MB, hemos logrado en horarios nocturnos alcanzar 800 MB de velocidad en el segundo piso, es increible el aparato en general extraordinario, durante el dia siempre por arriba de los 300 MB, consideren claramente que tengan un plan de internet que les brinde esta capacidad, hoy dia ya no es tan caro. ๐
SPaddy –
Review Asus ZENWiFi XT9
This is a review of the 2 unit Mesh system: a router and a node. Asus has done an excellent job of making a very sophisticated system easy to use for the novice. But if you are not a WiFi expert you can get into trouble quick. Fortunately, I do have a good deal of knowledge about these things, but I am far from the โknow-it-allโ status.
I consider Asus the Lexus of computers and WiFi systems. In my opinion it is premium quality equipment.
If you are buying a product like this there are some things, you should know. The 5 GHz band, from 5.1 through 5.9 it is a wild and crazy world, it is not completely regulated and there are no real solid rules and regulations to live by. Each company making a mesh system has some flexibility on how they can implement their system in this very undefined area, the 5 GHz band. I selected this system because it seems to be the best WiFi 6 and complete Mesh system out there. I did not feel the WiFi 6e, 7, or 8 is ready for me, maybe 6 or more years down the road.
Things you need to know:
1. Model and serial numbers. The Model and serial numbers are on the outside of the box for the two pack โ router and node. Those box numbers are used for warranty and registration.
2. Use the Asus Router App on your phone to set it up, you can use the Web Gui later for regular maintenance and adjustments after your system is up and running.
3. Intel WiFi Driver fact sheet โAdvanced WiFi Helper Tipโ โ pay attention to it. It may be very important to you, so do not overlook it. There is no mention of it in the instructions or on the Asus web site, that I know of. I recommend using the Intel WiFi Driver check-up from the Intel download center even if your WiFi card is not listed. That automatic checking by Intel seems to work perfectly and it may improve your laptops.
First Set-Up out of the box: This mesh system will establish a WiFi backhaul first. That is accomplished with the second 5-GHz Band, it has the 4×4 antenna and it is 100% rock solid and fast. If you can, I suggest you run it that way at least a couple of days before going to ethernet backhaul. I will venture to say most users will continue in that manner; after all it is an exceptionally strong WiFi backhaul, with only one caveat that I am aware of. As I understand it, the first 5-GHz Bank only has a 2×2 antenna (the caveat).
I wanted the absolute maximum speed for all WiFi clients that needed it, so I went with Ethernet backhaul. Now WiFi clients that need the fastest speed, have it with the second 5-GHz band.
There are way too many โprosโ to list for this product, most of them you will see in the sales literature. Some biggies are: Trend Micro built in. 4 ethernet ports on router and node. USB ports on both units, back up media, or print servers, and many more. A GUI interface that is Top Drawer.
Cons:
No detailed and complete instruction manual, thus nothing is cataloged or indexed. The Asus web site only provides about half what you may search for. I get better results by doing an internet search, which will often take me to Asus for details on the product. It is odd that Asus does not provide that directly. However, the WEB Gui Links for specific support topics will usually answer about 80% of your questions in a detailed manner.
It would be nice if both 5-GHz Bands had the 4×4 antenna. I think you can get that in their products that cost a lot more.
DFS, this is part of the non-structured, partially regulated, and unregulated, mess of the 5-GHz world. It appears that Asus has done a very good job to work around the madness. So far, I have had only โoneโ occurrence when the second 5-GHz band went off-line. It could have been a radar (of any source), it could have been a neighbor next door, or it could have been a result of my โfineโ tunning. As of now, it appears that the Asus โautoโ mode of channel selection has found a way to bypass the radar issues, only time will tell if that is a true statement.
I used a defined SSID for each of the three bands, that is I did not use โSmart Connectโ after going to ethernet backhaul. This allowed me to โtargetโ my three bands. For your heavy-duty WiFi Laptops using the 4×4 mode this could make a big difference in the speed. YMMV.
I strongly recommend this product.
Cliente Amazon –
We bought a pair of these ASUS mesh routers because our telco supplied routers were not giving us a good signal on all parts of our 2,000 sq ft single level condo. We also hoped to see our wifi signal outdoors for doing software upgrades on our Tesla Model Y. These routers accomplished both tasks: we now have great internet throughout our condo with no dead spots, and we can actually see our wifi four floors down outside our condo building. Very satisfied with this product.
Yolotzin Hernandez –
No es tan fรกcil de instalar directamente con la pc o laptop, me funciono mejor con uno solo conectado y usรกndolo como mesh, que usando los 2 como mesh, ya quรฉ cuento con un router principal. El segundo, cuando lo instalaba, no distribuian bien el trabajo. Preferirรญa usar uno solo o tal vez los 2 pero 1 como router y el otro, como mesh.
Jorge Lara –
Consistently fast 600+ mbps. Never lost connection anywhere in the condo. 3 lans on the side, good enough for anything that needs to be plugged in. Otherwise wireless is just as easy and reliable. You have the option to bind ip to any device to like so the ip never changes even if have to reboot the router. You can choose different ssid for the 2 5Ghz network, or keep the same name. Totally up to you. This router is the most secure out of all the ones Iโve used in the past. I bought a single, since I donโt have a big space. If I need an upgrade on figure, configuring a node for the extra space is easy enough.
YukonArthur –
Me gusto el funcionamiento y que cuenta con la app muy completa
SPaddy –
Night and day coming from a Ubiquiti AP in terms of setup and performance. I’ve only been using this setup for a day, so longer term performance is still TBD, but everything has been excellent so far. Worth noting that my use cases and infrastructure might be simpler than many folks but even then, some of the negative reviews are a bit baffling given my experience.
Pros:
– Stupid-simple setup. The entire network with both devices was up and running within ~15 minutes of opening the box. I’m probably more technically inclined than others, but a child could figure this out. As simple as connecting the router to your modem, turning it on, and then walking through the in-app setup. The mesh node was about as plug-and-play as it gets, at least when using ethernet backhaul. It was recognized and configured almost immediately as a secondary node in the network.
– Mobile app. Used for initial setup and management. Could probably be done through the web-ui but I don’t really see a reason to do that on initial setup. Save time and just download/use the app.
– Web UI. The router management web UI is more robust and a bit easier to navigate than the mobile app. Will likely use this going forward for more detailed configuration and monitoring.
– Performance. Both speed and coverage are incredible. I pay for 1000/20 and consistently got ~930/~25 with the speed test in the Asus app. 5Ghz WiFi speed tests (fast dot com) on newer devices averaged ~750/~25. 2.4Ghz varied but was consistently fast and reliable. Full signal on various devices throughout the house and outside on both bands.
– Wired backhaul. Worth mentioning specifically because I saw some reviews that complained about this not working very well or at all when a switch was in between the two units. It worked immediately and works well for me. There’s also multiple physical connections between the node, the wall and the switch itself and there still aren’t any problems. if you run into problems, its probably worth double-checking your cabling (CAT 5E+), hardware (switch compatibility/1G+ ports), and Asus config
Cons:
– Asus UI/UX. Very minor issues just getting used to and understanding how to navigate the UI both on the mobile app and on the web. It seems simple enough now though after poking around. Not worth docking the rating.
– 2.4 Ghz. Noticed in some instances where the speeds were sporadically low on 2.4 Ghz, but I generally don’t use that and it isn’t consistent enough to dock a star. Most of the connected devices on the network default to or have to use the 2.4 band, so it could just be some basic congestion. As of this writing, I’m getting 150/22 on my laptop while situated near the secondary node, which is more than acceptable. I’ll look deeper into the settings and report back if there are problems.
– SSID management. Fairly negligible but worth mentioning like others have. The default configuration uses a single SSID for both 5 and 2.4 Ghz bands which I immediately turned off. I assume most folks would want the delineation of the two like me. The other knock here is that it will broadcast the alternate 5 Ghz channel used for wireless backhaul. I don’t intend to ever use the wireless backhaul, but, unless I’m missing something, Asus seems to force it to be left on as a fallback in case the wired connection ever drops. I’m fine leaving it on as a fallback but I’ll at least see if I can hide the SSID without causing problems with the network, since it should never be used by regular clients.
TBD:
– Long-term performance. Very satisfied at the moment but I’m sure most would agree that a huge percentage of the value is how these things hold up over time. I’ll report back as needed.
– Advanced features. I haven’t spent enough time with the router management software to really understand the pros and cons here quite yet.
– IOT connection stability. Saw some reviews that dinged connection drops for connected devices. No issues to report yet. I used the same SSID and passwords as before. Everything connected seamlessly and appears to be working. I’ll keep an eye on this as well.
– Wireless backhaul. I have not tested wireless backhaul and I don’t really intend to. In fact, I don’t really see the utility of using wireless backhaul if you can avoid it. For the XT8, it relies on an alternate channel on the 5Ghz band. This is obviously going to be slower than ethernet from the jump but the 5Ghz band is much more “fragile” and can quickly become very limited by physical distance and obstructions between the two nodes, even if the actual channel is dedicated strictly for backhaul instead of regular traffic.
Misc. Notes:
Physical setup:
– Cable connection from the street comes into the basement, which is where the modem and the main router are situated.
– The house is fully wired via ethernet. A 10-port gigabit switch also sits in the basement with the modem and router, which feeds the wall ports in various rooms throughout the home.
– Only a handful of the wall ports are actually used consistently. One for the entertainment center, one for a PC and one for an AP on the second floor of the home.
– Various connected and personal devices throughout the house. Smart speakers, smart TVs, Nest thermostats, a camera, dog collar, wireless printer. Personal devices include cellphones, laptops, and tablets.
Previous hardware:
– Netgear Nighthawk 6700 running DD-WRT, located in basement. Older model but the reputation precedes itself. Worked fairly well on stock firmware for a little while. Decided to switch to DD-WRT after cord-cutting and increased bandwidth needs for remote work and more IOT devices. DD-WRT improved things for a little while. I toyed with various setups but ultimately wanted the router to feed all connectivity in the house, so it remained in the basement.
– Ubiquiti AP on 2nd floor for better coverage. The house is a recent reno but is originally ~200 years old. Whether the older construction materials of the innards of the house or just physical distance of having the router in the basement, it was difficult to get solid coverage throughout even with relatively modest square footage. The single AP worked well for a little while but UI/UX for Ubiquiti products is clunky at best and annoyingly difficult to configure. Performance degraded slowly over time and required lots of hand-holding just to remain stable. It also seemed impossible to get a true “mesh”-like network without having to purchase a second AP and completely turning off wifi on the main router. This didn’t seem appealing given the dissatisfaction with the Ubiquiti ecosystem as a whole.
Current hardware:
– Main AX6600 router in basement, replacing the Netgear 6700. Modem feeds the WAN port, single LAN port feeds the main switch for ethernet wall ports.
– Secondary AX6600 on 2nd floor as secondary AP Mesh Node, replacing Ubiquiti AP. Strictly uses ethernet backhaul via wall port