AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable – 1.5m

- 14%
Set Lowest Price Alert
×
Notify me, when price drops
Set Alert for Product: AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable-1.5m - $111.36
Price history
×
Price history for AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable-1.5m
Latest updates:
  • $111.36 - October 16, 2024
  • $129.95 - October 12, 2024
Since: October 12, 2024
  • Highest Price: $129.95 - October 12, 2024
  • Lowest Price: $111.36 - October 16, 2024
Last Amazon price update was: October 16, 2024 19:12
× Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon.com (Amazon.in, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.de, etc) at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
0
Add to compare
AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable – 1.5m
AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable – 1.5m

Original price was: $129.95.Current price is: $111.36.

AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable – 1.5m Price History

Price History for AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable-1.5m

Statistics

Current Price $111.36 October 16, 2024
Highest Price $129.95 October 12, 2024
Lowest Price $111.36 October 16, 2024
Since October 12, 2024

Last price changes

$111.36 October 16, 2024
$129.95 October 12, 2024

AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable – 1.5m Description

  • Solid 1.25% Silver Conductors
  • Solid High-Density Polyethylene Insulation
  • Gold-plated nickel connectors

AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable – 1.5m Specification

Specification: AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable – 1.5m

Is Discontinued By Manufacturer

No

Product Dimensions

3.88 ounces, 8.27 x 6.14 x 1.5 inches

Item model number

RJECIN01.5

Date First Available

January 30, 2012

Manufacturer

AudioQuest

Number of Items

1

Unit Count (Count)

1.0

Indoor Outdoor Usage

Indoor

Shape

Round

Color

Silver

Number of Pins

8

Connectivity Technology

Ethernet

Additional Features

High Speed

Ethernet Cable Category

Cat 7

Connector Gender

Female

Connector Type Used on Cable

RJ45

Cable Type

Ethernet

Compatible Devices

Personal Computer

UPC

092592002906

ASIN

B0073H05MG

Package Type

Standard Packaging

Model Number

RJECIN01.5

Brand Name

AudioQuest

Model Name

AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable

Outer Material

cardboard" or "NA

AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable – 1.5m Reviews (9)

9 reviews for AudioQuest Cinnamon RJ/E Ethernet Cable – 1.5m

5.0 out of 5
9
0
0
0
0
Write a review
Show all Most Helpful Highest Rating Lowest Rating
  1. Enrique Vargas

    Some people will say that cables don’t matter, any cable will work and so on, but I am a true believer that the better the quality of cable, the better performance you will receive. Now, is that statement for everyone? No, but I believe you have to try, sit, review and compare for yourself in order to know what everyone speaks of who believe in cable upgrades.
    With that said, I compared these with a Monster Cat 6, a Rocketfish Cat 6, a Monster 5, Generic cat 6, and a Generic Cat 5A that came with the cable modem and a Tera Grand Cat 7.
    I knew that I at first wanted to upgrade from the Cat 5A because I knew that I could get better speed with a Cat 6, so I then bought the Monster cat 6 and it made a difference in speed and in quality of HD movies from Netflix. I then upgraded the cablevision modem to a Surfboard and notice a slight speed improvement but also noticed a lot of interference that was preventing the modem to reach it’s true speed capability. I then researched and read reviews that cat 7 cables were faster and better shielded than cat 6 cables. I then bought Tera Grands which are sold here on Amazon and there was a major improvement in speed but it was never steady, I read so many reviews that state that those cables are hit or miss when it comes to getting a good one, one day I would receive great steady pings and MBPS, and the next it would be off the wall. So I decided to test the Audioquest ones and once I received them I hooked them up right away and wow, steady Pings and MBPS and no drops, I receive a steady 70 and above MBPS with cablevision when it use to drop down past 30 when I had the tera Grands connected.
    So, the rocketfish Cat 6 were the better from the Cat 6 cables, the tera Grands were good but if you live in a city with much interference the shielding will not be enough, go for these. Are they expensive? Yes, but they are worth the peace of mind if you care about picture quality, I have a 51 inch plasma and a 40 inch LCD and trust me, test your own cables and compare them to these. Go to Netflix or any other streaming set you may have, set it to the highest streaming quality and that is the best way to test these cables out.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  2. Amazon Customer

    audioquest a une tres bonne réputation

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  3. Robert

    I’m open minded when it comes to cables. It’s reasonable to me that different analog cable construction might yield different sound characteristics. It’s reasonable to me that timing in a digital signal is relevant to music reproduction (especially given the importance Dacs place on low jitter components).

    I have what I think can be fairly called a very to ultra revealing system that I’ve built over a period of several years. Hedd Type 20s (*superb monitors btw*, liked them better than Genelec 8341s) < Audioquest Mackenzie XLR < Adam Sub 8 < Mackenzie XLR < RME ADI2 Dac < Audioquest Coffee USB < PC < Cinnamon RJ/E < Modem

    I had been going back and forth on trying the Cinnamon RJ/E cable as an upgrade to the Pearl. I did not notice much improvement when upgrading to the Pearl (maybe a mild improvement in warmth/clarity but subtle if at all), and so I was pretty skeptical about the Cinnamon, and was ready to return it if I didn’t notice anything significant.

    Well, I am pretty surprised. When A/Bing it with the Pearl, I could tell a difference right away. This is what I’ve noticed so far after about 4 hours of listening:

    -Smoother, slightly more natural sound

    -An increase in clarity

    -A slightly/moderately wider and deeper soundstage. Music is notably, though moderately more holographic. It feels like I’ve zoomed in on the music a bit. When you upgrade speakers or a Dac, you get this same effect but far more magnified.

    -Music just sounds tonally better and cleaner, moderately so, but noticeable.

    -Bass slam seems to have increased a bit

    The improvements I’ve noticed with this cable are hard to describe exactly, but I’m actually really pleased with the difference. I think it is a bigger improvement than when I went from the Carbon USB to the Coffee actually.

    What I think now is that perhaps my ethernet cable was the weak link in my system, and upgrading it has allowed the other components to shine more (it’s also the first cable in my chain after my modem).

    Is the improvement anything close to upgrading speakers? Not even close. But there IS a difference. I’m still surprised given a lot of musical data is (AFAIK) cached on your HD before you even hear it (Youtube video pre-loading for example) and so where would the ethernet cable play a role at that point?

    Still, this cable is already increasing my enjoyment of the audio from my system more than its proportional cost to my system overall. I give it an enthusiastic 5 stars and suggest trying it. It may or may not work but you can always return it.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  4. Rodentman

    It’s hard to ascribe adjectives to a subjective experience as a cable change, but I will try. I use this cable to connect my Eero mesh node to my BluSound Streamer. I replaced the stock cable with this AQ one and found the sound more rhythmic and engaging. I cannot say anything specific such as the bass was stronger, etc. but the music just was more FUN and enjoyable. I suppose some may say it was just my expectations being met, but I really FELT an improvement in the listening experience. Worth the $ to me. The Eero node has 2 wired outputs. I ordered another of these cables to feed my BluRay player.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  5. Thomas

    Hatte vorher das Pearl welches auch gut war. Nach kurzem Hörtest bin ich der Meinung die Stimmen grenzen sich besser gegeneinander ab und hören sich natürlicher an. Auf jeden Fall eine Verbesserung.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  6. Fatman

    Ich hätte nicht gedacht, dass ein besseres Netzwerkkabel auch „bessere“ Nullen und Einsen liefert und dass 1,5m dabei soviel ausmachen.

    Versuch macht klug – wow, was für ein Unterschied. Es hat mich nicht einmal lange gedauert bis ich kleine Nuancen ausmachen konnte – die Verbesserungen sind im gesamten Klangspektrum eklatant.

    Und so macht am Ende das billigste Teil meiner Anlage mit den größten Unterschied aus.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  7. Gil Lester

    I’ve been a audiophile for a number of years and I have spent a fortune on cables (Transparent Cables) in the past. I was going over my TV connections the other day and realized that I have never upgraded my TV connections, I had fairly run of the mill cables. I thought I would start slowly and buy Audioquest Cinnamon ethernet cables and see if it made a difference… huge difference! I was elated to say the least, so from there I went to the Cinnamon HDMI for picture and optical for audio connection into the soundbar. I have augmented my three different systems by at least 30-40% better sound/picture. I have read article after article that upgraded cables don’t make a difference. Don’t believe it. To make even a stronger point about cables, I work with a jazz trio and through the years I have used top of the line Transparent cables (power cable and RCA connection from bass to amp on my up-right bass. I wish you could hear the difference. Opps, I get carried away when I talk cables. The good ones work!

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  8. German Menendez Agudo

    Tengo un buen equipo, no es cualquier cosa, no sé si con equipos de menor entidad se notará menos o nada. Ha habido una mejora más evidente con este cable del router al streamer (Arcam Rplay) sustituyendo un Cat8, que del streamer al amplificador (Synthesis Roma96) cambiando un cable barato de 10€ por un Chord Epic RCA,unos cablecitos de más 300€ del ala. Y un cambio tan grande como pasar de un cable de altavoces barato ( de esos OFC de a 5€ el metro y muy gordos ) por un también Chord Epic Twin…me hubiera gustado el equivalente que tiene Chord… Pero es un dineral y este cumple muy bien….aunque nunca se sabe, visto lo visto lo mismo merece la pena invertir más….de momento me quedo así. Escucho Dezeer HIFi ( que en mi opinion es el servidor con mejor sonido ) y he probado Tidal Hifi, Amazon…Que mejoras hay? pues la tipica de un buen cable, lo más evidente es la definicion, los detalles… mejora el balance tonal esto es que con el Cat8 se me quedaba muy del lado grave y oscuro..muerto y con poca dinamica, con un cable de incluso peor calidad el sonido era tirando a delgado y los bajos perdian demasiada presencia, este Audioquest ajusta los bajos y los agudos estan mas presentes y mas naturales, gana en dinamica…Aun lo tengo que conocer mejor porque es cierte que en mi opinion para que un cable te de algo y no te quite nada ( que esto me ha pasado por ejpmplo con unos Nordost ) tiene que tene un minimo de calidad. Parece que este llega a ese minimo… luego está el que te acabe gustando o busques más allá…como he dicho antes creo que se quedará, si cambia la cosa modificaré la reseña

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  9. Chris Breckenridge

    Great product.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this

    Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

    Discompare.com
    Logo
    Compare items
    • Cameras (0)
    • Phones (0)
    Compare