Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM3A013 1TB NVMe SSD

Que nomedio mucho es pasio como esperaba

SSD tam bir S klas, sakın endişeniz olmasın. Vaad ettiği hızları çok serin bir şekilde sağlayabiliyor.

8 aydır kullanıyorum ve tek kelimeyle harika. Almadan önce çok araştırmıştım ve reddit kullanıcıların oluşturduğu SSD Tier List’e bakarak bu ürünü almaya karar verdim. Oradaki listede de en üst seviye SSD olduğundan bahsediliyor.

Hergün kullandığım pc’de 8 aydır kullanıyorum, sağlık hala %100 görünüyor.
Kesinlikle tavsiye edilir.

I bought two of the1 TB SSDs to fill the remaining two M.2 slots on the 4 slot PCIe x16 Gen 3 expansion card in a Mac Pro. The other two are populated with Samsung 970 Pro 1 TB x 2. These being PCIe Gen 4 are noticeably faster even in a Gen 3 system as compared to the Samsung 970 Pro, so I have them setup as boot and home volumes respectively, and gave new life to the slower drives as a RAID0 striped set for write-intensive data.

The advertised speed is 7000MB/s but CrystalDisk says otherwise. I ran this test twice: once using my onboard NVMe slot and external reader, both read approximately the same speeds.

I loaded the drive with Call of Duty and although the loading times were fine, the initial install took way longer than my Samsung 970 EVO (my testing drive for benchmarks). FireCuda 530 completed the installation in approximately 39 minutes, whereas my Samsung 970 completed it in around 32 minutes. I should note that both installations were performed on Steam with unlimited/unthrottled download speeds and both clean-formatted drives.

Does the extra 7 minutes matter? Probably not, especially to the average consumer or casual, new-build PC gamer. However, seeing as how you can now buy the 970 for just around or even under the price of FireCuda 530, it’s almost a no-brainer to go with the former.

I should mention Samsung has the 990 PRO at great deals here on Amazon and other competitors for just a couple of bucks more, so I’ll likely be returning this. But again, this is great if you’re on a budget build and don’t care about numbers. It’ll work just as well if not better, than any other NVMe.

Updated note: If there’s one thing NVMe makers need to do, it’s to stop putting stickers on the drives themselves. I had to remove the stickers to allow my heatsink with thermal paste to sit properly.

I’m using it for the last two years, it works very hard and it’s still very good, great purchase.

very easy to install, fast speeds and great amount of storage for frequently accessed programs.

Parfait en disque système (1), avec des temps de réponse très courts et d’excellentes performances sur gros fichiers avec un débit en lecture dépassant les 5GB/s (le constructeur annonce un max de 7,3 GB/s), excellente endurance annoncée, avec garantie contractuelle de 5 ans et récupération gratuite de données pendant 3 ans.

Utilitaires SeaTools efficaces mais avec une interface assez laide.

(1) : 1 To est beaucoup plus que strictement nécessaire, mais conserver plus de 80 % du disque libre permet d’optimiser l’usure des cellules, ou “wear leveling”, de consacrer une bonne taille au “SLC caching”, où les cellules TLC (normalement 3 bits) sont utilisées en SLC (1 bit par cellule), donc de prolonger la durée de vie du SSD tout en offrant les meilleures performances.